Webinars
Carving Yin From Yang: The Curious Split Between Change and Innovation
Aug 19, 2010

Breakfast Club
San Francisco: The Next Frontier for Learning and Development
Sep 23, 2010 07:30 am
The Ritz-Carlton, San Francisco
San Francisco, California

CLO Symposiums
Unleashing Learning: From Strategy to Execution
Sep 27, 2010 - Sep 29, 2010
The Ritz-Carlton, Laguna Niguel
Dana Point, California

Industry News

Executives Believe One-Quarter of Meetings Are Unnecessary

Print this Article  Email this Article

Menlo Park, Calif.
Professionals should think twice before scheduling that next meeting, a survey suggests. Managers interviewed said 28 percent of these gatherings are a waste of time. Moreover, almost half of respondents (45 percent) felt employees would be more productive if their companies banned meetings one day a week.

The survey was developed by OfficeTeam, a staffing service specializing in the placement of skilled administrative professionals. It was conducted by an independent research firm and includes responses from 150 senior executives at the nation’s 1,000 largest companies.

Executives were asked, “What percentage of meetings do you feel are unnecessary?” The average response was 28 percent.

Executives also were asked, “How much more or less productive do you believe your employees would be if your company banned meetings one day a week?” Their responses:

• Much more productive = 13 percent
• Somewhat more productive = 32 percent
• No change = 46 percent
• Somewhat less productive = 4 percent
• Much less productive = 3 percent
• Don’t know/no answer = 2 percent

“Businesses are operating with lean teams, which implies more people are stretched for time,” said Robert Hosking, executive director of OfficeTeam. “Sometimes meetings outlive their original purpose, so professionals should carefully consider whether one is warranted or if there’s a more efficient way to share the information.”

Hosking added, “The adage, ‘Be brief, be brilliant, be gone,’ rings particularly true in the workplace right now. Meeting organizers and participants both play a role in keeping these gatherings in check.”

OfficeTeam offers five signs that a meeting could be a time waster:

• Everything but the kitchen sink is being covered. It’s wise to have an agenda, but one that is lengthy or unfocused could indicate that not all of the information will be relevant to every attendee. When the agenda becomes too long, organizers should consider whether it would be better to hold smaller, more focused gatherings.
• It’ll take more than an hour. You often lose people after 60 minutes, so think carefully about scheduling a meeting that will take more than an hour of someone’s time. If there’s no way to condense, consider snacks, interactive elements or multiple speakers to keep people engaged.
• The attendee list goes on and on. When a participant list is extensive, it may signal an overly ambitious meeting, or one where people are being invited as a courtesy, rather than because they need to attend. If you’re organizing the meeting, be sure to list people as “optional” if their presence isn’t required.
• There’s a large PowerPoint deck involved. Visuals can be useful for reinforcing information, but it’s possible much of that information could be shared prior to the meeting. The gathering then could be used to field questions or highlight the most important data.
• It’s a habit. Routine meetings can become, well, routine. Think about whether regular gatherings are necessary or could be held less frequently.

“Meeting participants who notice these signs should confirm with the host that their attendance is required and, if so, offer ideas for keeping the meeting efficient,” said Hosking.

August 2010
The Road Ahead
by Tamar Elkeles

Tamar Elkeles is vice president of Qualcomm’s Learning Center and the author of The Chief Learning Officer: Driving Value Within a Changing Organization Through Learning and Development. She can be reached at editor@clomedia.com.

August 2010
The Case for Communities of Practice
by Jay Cross

Jay Cross is CEO of Internet Time Group and a thought leader in informal learning and organizational performance. He can be reached at editor@clomedia.com.

August 2010
An Informal Debate
by Michael E. Echols, Ph.D.

Michael E. Echols is the vice president of strategic initiatives at Bellevue University. He is the author of ROI on Human Capital Investment. He can be reached at editor@clomedia.com.

Profile

August 2010
Learning Gets Credit
by Mike Prokopeak

At MasterCard Worldwide, Ron Garrow is integrating learning into the company’s talent management to raise engagement and drive innovation.

Case Study

August 2010
Accounting for Learning
by Shawn Englund

By re-engineering content delivery, Grant Thornton saved significant time and money. That should make any accountant smile.

Business Intelligence

August 2010
Building Experts
by Vincent Racioppo

Deep performance analysis can uncover hidden expertise and provide a laser-like focus for developing and deploying talent.