Breakfast Club
Philadelphia: The Next Frontier for Learning and Development
Mar 18, 2010 07:30 am
Four Seasons Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Webinars
Improving Emotional Intelligence Through Behavioral Style
Mar 18, 2010

CLO Symposiums
The Networked Organization: Leading Learning in the New Economy
Apr 12, 2010 - Apr 14, 2010
Boca Raton Resort & Club
Boca Raton, Florida

See More Events

Industry News

Study: Coaching, Mentoring Programs Underused Leadership-Development Tool

Print this Article  Email this Article

St. Petersburg, Fla. — June 8 
Improving leadership capabilities always seems to be at the top of the wish list for most corporations, but if they really want to see improvement, companies should take a harder look at their coaching and mentoring programs.

Despite the fact that most say such programs are very valuable, fewer than one-fifth think their own programs are good or excellent, according to a just-released study conducted by the Institute for Corporate Productivity.

The study found that, of the more than 300 organizations polled, half don’t have such programs at all.

“There seems to be a tremendous missed opportunity here,” said Jay Jamrog, i4cp senior vice president of research. “Our study shows that the most common use for these programs is to develop executives and other managers. But in an age when so many organizations are saying there’s a shortage of leadership, they’re underutilizing one of the best tools available.”

The study found only about half of respondents say their organizations have formal coaching and mentoring programs (49 percent coaching, 47 percent mentoring).

When asked what percentage of their employees use coaches or mentors, 52 percent said coaches were used by 5 percent or fewer of workers, and 62 percent said the same thing about mentors.

“Three out of five respondents said they considered coaching to be quite valuable or very valuable,” Jamrog said. “Yet, 82 percent reported their coaching programs were only ‘average’ or below. By boosting both the quality and usage of these programs, organizations might make a huge dent in today’s and tomorrow’s leadership shortages.”

To find coaches and mentors, most organizations look internally, with 68 percent reporting they find their coaches in-house, compared with 93 percent locating mentors within the company.

When selecting coaches externally, 55 percent rely on recommendations from colleagues or other organizations.

The top coaching qualification listed (71 percent) was business experience, followed by recommendations and consulting experience.

As for training of mentors, 44 percent of respondents use some type of internal training function, and 39 percent said no special training is required. Thirty-two percent report using in-house mentors to train others.

The Coaching/Mentoring Practitioner Consensus Survey was conducted by i4cp, in conjunction with HR.com, in May 2007.

March 2010
Five Innovative Online Courses
by Brandon Hall

Make the most of e-learning

March 2010
Securing the Future
by Fred Harburg

Lessons from an educational innovator

March 2010
The Right Feedback
by Bob Mosher

Leverage your untapped resources

Case Study

March 2010
Health Care Learning for the Next Generation
by Bill Perry

With a collaborative, networked learning system in place, NextGen cures health care providers’ hesitancy to innovate.

Business Intelligence

March 2010
Talent Management as Survival Skill
by Cushing Anderson

Talent management emerged from the recession relatively unscathed, and many CLOs see it as the way up and out of the economic downturn.

Profile

March 2010
Special Delivery: Learning at UPS
by Daniel Margolis

Anne Schwartz delivers a workforce that is the complete package via a philosophy of experiential rotation and a strong emphasis on simulations.