Webinars
The Learning Case for Difference: How CLOs Can Make Diversity Work for the Company
Jul 23, 2009

Breakfast Club
San Francisco: High-Impact Learning for Lean Times
Sep 03, 2009 07:30 am
Grand Hyatt San Francisco
San Francisco, California

CLO Symposiums
Peak Performance: Pushing Your Enterprise to the Top
Sep 28, 2009 - Sep 30, 2009
The Broadmoor
Colorado Springs, Colorado

See More Events

Executive Briefings

Published April 2008

MBA Candidates Compete in Business Simulation Competition

  

  Brian Summerfield

These days, many corporate learning functions are turning to simulations to develop and assess proficiency in everything from soft skills to business operations. When properly designed, these experiences give participants the chance to learn by doing in an immersive environment where it’s safe to experiment, fail and take away important lessons.

Now compare that to an MBA candidate competition that involves students evaluating problems presented in the form of business case studies and giving one-shot pitches on solutions to panels of judges that may or may not assess these solutions on objective, determinable criteria. Of these two, which learning experience do you think today’s B-school students would prefer?

Not surprisingly, BTS, a producer of business simulations, believes students would rather take part in the first kind of experience. The company put this conviction to the test when it recently conducted its first-ever University Challenge, a two-day competition held on the 66th floor of the Sears Tower in downtown Chicago.

Five teams of students from business schools at the University of Michigan, Notre Dame, Indiana University, Northwestern University and the University of Chicago participated in the competition. Each team was provided in advance with an overview of the fictitious company they’d be running. All of the businesses were in the biotech industry.

On the first day, after a brief introduction that laid out the parameters of the competition, BTS representatives stepped out of the way and let the teams get to work.

“We gave them the tools they’d use for the next two days, and we let them have at it,” said Steve Toomey, senior vice president and managing director of BTS’ Chicago office. “They effectively ran these businesses. We ran three iterations of operating the business, with each cycle representing about four to seven years, which makes sense in the biotech world.”

One of the first things they had to do was organize themselves into a corporate structure, said Rommin Adl, executive vice president and managing director of the Philadelphia office for BTS. “The teams are put into the senior leadership of these fictitious companies, and they have to organize themselves into the CEO and functional roles of the business,” he said.

Once the teams were organized, they began to formulate strategies according to the characteristics of their respective companies, as well as the “market” they were competing in. At one point or another, they all came across serious challenges, some that were embedded in the simulation.

“We lobbed business grenades into things,” Toomey said. “As they pursued different therapeutic areas, some ran into dead-ends. They expended hundreds of millions of dollars pursuing some new therapy or drug compound, only to find that it had a safety fail or that it wasn’t as effective as they’d hoped it would be or that they have to deal with different dosage requirements.

Registered users are allowed to post comments. Login   Register